Evaluation of Classical Guidance Programs During the Covid-19 Pandemic at Junior High School: Discrepancy Model

Authors

  • Hani Nurrofifah Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Muh. Farozin Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Asfarina Mutiara Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v7i22022p62-70

Keywords:

program evaluation, classical guidance, the discrepancy model , evaluasi program, bimbingan klasikal, model discrepancy

Abstract

Abstract: Guidance and counseling programs are designed to improve education. These programs continue to evolve, especially the classical guidance programs that require adaptation to the current Covid-19 pandemic education system. However, due to a lack of planning, the development and implementation of the classical guidance program in state junior high schools during the Covid-19 pandemic have not been optimal. Thus, this study identifies the performance of the classical guidance program at state junior high schools during the Covid-19 pandemic, using predetermined standards. This study used program evaluation standards and criteria from the Guidelines for Performance-Based Professional School Counselor Evaluation. The guidelines highlight that professional school counselors should carry out classical guidance services using effective learning strategies and classroom management techniques for all counselees based on their needs. These standards and criteria were then formulated into three components to determine the success of the classical guidance program, namely planning, implementing, and evaluating the classical guidance program. The analysis of the evaluation results showed that the classical guidance program during the Covid-19 had not met the standard.

Abstrak: Program bimbingan dan konseling dirancang untuk meningkatkan pendidikan. Program bimbingan dan konseling terus berkembang, terutama program bimbingan klasikal yang membutuhkan adaptasi dengan sistem pendidikan pada pandemi Covid-19. Meskipun demikian, perencanaan, pengembangan dan pelaksanaan program bimbingan klasikal di sekolah menengah pertama selama pandemi Covid-19 belum berjalan dengan optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi kinerja program bimbingan klasikal di sekolah menengah pertama negeri selama pandemi Covid-19 menggunakan standar yang telah ditentukan. Standar dan kriteria evaluasi program yang digunakan adalah Guidelines Performance-Based Professional School Counselor Evaluation. Pedoman tersebut menyoroti bahwa konselor sekolah profesional harus melaksanakan layanan bimbingan klasikal dengan menggunakan strategi pembelajaran yang efektif dan teknik pengelolaan kelas untuk semua konseli berdasarkan kebutuhannya. Standar dan kriteria ini kemudian dirumuskan menjadi tiga komponen untuk menentukan keberhasilan program bimbingan klasikal, yaitu perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi program bimbingan klasikal. Analisis hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa program bimbingan klasikal selama Covid-19 belum memenuhi standar.

References

American School Counselor Association. (2016). ASCA ethical standards for school counselors.

Ariati, P. (2021). Peranan guru bimbingan dan konseling dalam pelayanan kepada peserta didik pada masa pendemi covid-19 di SMP N 7 Muaro Jambi. Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, 11(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v11i1.207

Azizah, F., Ginting, F. B., & Utami, R. S. (2017). Evaluasi pelaksanaan program layanan bimbingan dan konseling di sekolah. Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan dan Konseling, 1(1), 177–188.

Azwar, S. (2017). Metode penelitian psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Badrujaman, A. (2011). Teori dan aplikasi evaluasi program bimbingan konseling. Jakarta: Indeks.

Barida, M. (2016). Evaluasi pelaksanaan layanan dasar bidang pribadi-sosial di SMP Negeri 1 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 2(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.52657/jfk.v2i1.128

Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (2014). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. John Wiley & Sons.

Bowers, J., & Hatch, P. A. (2012). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs. ERIC.

Christensen, C. B. (2014). Human ecology as philosophy. Human Ecology Review, 31–49.

Ekasari, P. A. (2019). Evaluasi program bimbingan dan konseling: Sebuah studi pustaka. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Indonesia, 4(2), 39–42.

Firda, E., & Atikah, J. F. (2020). Layanan bimbingan dan konseling ditengah pandemi Covid-19. PD ABKIN Jatim Open Journal System, 1(1), 490–494. https://doi.org/10.1234/pdabkin.v1i1.77

Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2011). Program evaluation alternative approaches and practical guidelines.

Gibson, R. L., & Mitchell, M. H. (2005). Introduction to counseling and guidance. Pearson Education.

Gozali, A. (2020). Layanan bimbingan dan konseling berbasis teknologi informasi pada masa PSBB (pembatasan sosial berskala besar). Coution : Journal of Counseling and Education, 1(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.47453/coution.v1i2.117

Gysbers, N. C., & Henderson, P. (2014). Developing and managing your school guidance and counseling program. John Wiley & Sons.

Hadiwinarto, H., Mishabuddin, A., & Sulian, I. (2018). Evaluasi dalam bimbingan dan konseling. Seminar Konseling 2017. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP.

Hastuti, M. M. S., & Tyas, P. H. P. (2021). Online media usage in guidance and counseling services during Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 6(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v6i22021p060-070

Hidayat, A. H. (2020). Evaluasi program bimbingan dan konseling. Jurnal Al-Irsyad: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 2(1), 137–150.

Kamalia, W., Suyati, T., & Maulia, D. (2020). Layanan bimbingan klasikal berbasis daring selama masa pandemik Covid 19. DE_JOURNAL (Dharmas Education Journal), 1(2), 96–106.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 111 Tahun 2014 Tentang Bimbingan dan Konseling Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. , (2014).

Listiyani, A. (2021). Layanan bimbingan dan konseling pada saat pandemi Covid-19 di SMK Negeri 3 Pati. Empati-Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.26877/empati.v8i1.7975

Lopez, C. J., & Mason, E. C. M. (2017). School counselors as curricular leaders: A content analysis of ASCA lesson plans. Professional School Counseling, 21(1b), 2156759X18773277.

Matarif, J. (2020). Upaya pelayanan guru bimbingan dan konseling selama pandemi Covid-19 pada siswa di SMP Negeri 23 Banjarmasin. Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB.

Mielgo-Conde, I., Seijas-Santos, S., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Review about online educational guidance during the Covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(8), 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080411

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Guidelines for performance based professional school counselor evaluation. , (2000).

Monge, C., Gómez Hernández, P., & Jiménez Arenas, T. (2020). Cierre de Escuelas en Contextos Vulnerables desde la Perspectiva de los Orientadores: Impacto en Zonas Rurales. Revista Internacional de Educación Para La Justicia Social, 9(3), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.020

Mulawarman, M., Susilawati, S., Syifa, L., & Rifani, E. (2020). Classroom guidance strategy with flipped method in guidance and counseling services at Indonesia schools in the digital era. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 3(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.25217/igcj.v3i2.646

Putra, M. A., & Shofaria, N. (2020). Inovasi layanan bimbingan dan konseling di masa pembelajaran dalam jaringan masa pandemi Covid-19. Bikotetik (Bimbingan dan Konseling Teori dan Praktik), 4(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.26740/bikotetik.v4n2.p55-61

Putri, E. Y. (2021). Faktor penghambat pelaksanan layanan bimbingan dan konseling di SMK se Kabupaten Tegal pada masa Covid-19. DE_JOURNAL (Dharmas Education Journal), 2(1), 28–36.

Rohmadi, D., Santosa, A. B., & Adindo, A. W. (2021). The guidance and counseling on the COVID-19 pandemic period. Perspektif Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 12(1), 74–83.

Saputra, W. N. E. (2015). Evaluasi program konseling di SMP Kota Malang: Discrepancy model. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan & Konseling , 1(2), 180–187.

Scheerens, J., Glas, C. A. W., Thomas, S. M., & Thomas, S. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring: A systemic approach (Vol. 13). Taylor & Francis.

Sholihah, I. N., & Handayani, T. (2020). Pemanfaatan teknologi dalam layanan bimbingan dan konseling di tengah pandemi Covid 19. Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Bimbingan dan Konseling : Bimbingan dan Konseling di Era Revolusi Industi 4.0 : Surabaya, 16-19 Mei 2020, 477–483.

Sugianto, A. (2018). Evaluation program planning individual learning plans for education in SMP Negeri 1 Barabai: Discrepancy model. 1st International Conference on Creativity, Innovation and Technology in Education (IC-CITE 2018), 18–20. Atlantis Press.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan (kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, R & D dan penelitian tindakan). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanto, B., Purwanti, P., & Suroto, A. (2021). Bimbingan klasikal menumbuhkan motivasi belajar siswa di tengah pandemi Covid-19 di SMK Bina Patria 1 Sukoharjo. Jurnal Pendidikan, 30(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v30i1.1071

Yuniarti, W., & Asrowi, M. Y. (2021). The need of counseling services in pandemic Covid-19 for vocational students. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 5975–5984.

Yusuf, S., & Nurihsan, A. J. (2012). Landasan bimbingan dan konseling. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

22-06-2022

How to Cite

Nurrofifah, H., Farozin, M., & Mutiara, A. (2022). Evaluation of Classical Guidance Programs During the Covid-19 Pandemic at Junior High School: Discrepancy Model. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 7(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v7i22022p62-70

Issue

Section

Articles