International Research-Based Education Journal https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej <table cellpadding="2"> <tbody align="top"> <tr> <td width="135px">Journal Title</td> <td><strong>International Research-Based Education Journal</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>ISSN</td> <td><a href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1487553489" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2549-6875</a> (Online) &amp; <a href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1485234748" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2549-1687</a> (Print)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DOI Prefix</td> <td>10.17977</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Editor in Chief</td> <td><strong>Burhanuddin</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Publisher</td> <td><strong>Faculty of Education Universitas Negeri Malang</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frequency</td> <td><strong>2 issues per year</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top">Citation Analysis</td> <td><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Gzf-CIcAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_self">Google Scholar</a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>International Research-Based Education Journal (IRBEJ)</strong> is a peer-reviewed research journal that is published electronically, as open access for everyone. It is derived from educational research findings by researchers who have great commitment to share educational issues through global online publication and open information sharing. This will become one of the reliable spaces for discussions and debates concerning a series of challenging educational issues. The issues could be expanded to specific areas including education science, instructional leadership, educational management, curriculum development, and other related educational services. Therefore, the IRBEJ journal invites researchers, scholars, and professionals to submit original manuscripts on substantial, and unpublished research results in the specified areas. </p> <p><strong>AI Generative Policy</strong></p> <p><br />International Research-Based Education Journal recognizes the increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), including generative AI and AI-assisted technologies, in scholarly publishing. AI tools may assist authors in improving language clarity, organizing content, and supporting technical processes. However, their use must be carefully managed to uphold academic integrity, originality, transparency, accountability, confidentiality in peer review, as well as privacy, intellectual property, and other rights. This policy applies to authors, reviewers, editors, and editorial staff throughout the processes of manuscript preparation, peer review, and editorial handling. AI tools must not be used as a substitute for human critical thinking, scholarly judgment, or professional responsibility.</p> <p>For the purposes of this policy, AI tools refer to digital systems that utilize artificial intelligence techniques, such as machine learning or natural language processing, to generate, analyze, translate, summarize, or modify textual, numerical, visual, or audio data in a scholarly context. These include, but are not limited to, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language models; writing and language tools such as Grammarly or DeepL; as well as AI-assisted tools for data analysis, coding, visualization, and literature discovery.</p> <p>Authors may use AI tools provided that they maintain full responsibility for the content of their manuscripts. Basic language assistance, such as grammar checking, spelling correction, and minor improvements to readability that do not alter the scholarly meaning, does not require disclosure. However, if AI tools are used for more substantive purposes, including rewriting, restructuring, summarizing text, translation beyond minor editing, supporting coding or data analysis, or assisting in literature exploration or idea generation, authors must disclose such use. All AI-assisted outputs must be critically reviewed, verified, and validated by the authors to ensure accuracy, reliability, and academic integrity.</p> <p>The use of AI tools is strictly restricted in several areas. AI must not be used to generate entire manuscripts or substantial portions of original scholarly content in place of the authors’ own intellectual contribution. It must not be used to fabricate or manipulate data, results, or findings, nor to generate citations or references without verifying their existence and accuracy. AI must not be used in ways that constitute plagiarism or infringe upon copyright or third-party rights. Furthermore, the use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools to create or alter images, figures, or graphical content in submitted manuscripts is not permitted, except where such use forms part of the research methodology and is transparently described in a reproducible manner.</p> <p>Authors are solely responsible for all content submitted to the journal, including any material generated or modified using AI tools. They must ensure the accuracy, originality, and reliability of the manuscript, verify all references, eliminate bias and factual errors, and ensure proper citation and attribution of all sources. Authors must be able to explain their scholarly contributions and take full responsibility for any errors or ethical issues arising from AI-assisted work. AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors, as authorship implies accountability and responsibility that can only be fulfilled by humans.</p> <p>Authors must ensure that the use of AI tools complies with applicable terms and conditions, particularly regarding privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property. Confidential, proprietary, or personally identifiable information must not be uploaded to AI tools without appropriate safeguards. If AI tools are used beyond basic language assistance, authors must provide a clear disclosure in the manuscript, including the name of the tool, its version (if applicable), its provider, and a description of how it was used. Authors are encouraged to include a statement such as: “During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used [tool name] for [purpose]. All outputs were reviewed and verified by the authors, who take full responsibility for the content.”</p> <p>Peer review in International Research-Based Education Journal is based on confidentiality and human judgment. Reviewers must not upload manuscripts, review reports, or any related content into AI tools, nor use generative AI to perform the scientific evaluation or generate review conclusions. Similarly, editors and editorial staff must treat all submitted materials and communications as confidential and must not use AI tools to assist in editorial decision-making. All editorial decisions remain the responsibility of human editors.</p> <p>The journal may use screening tools, including similarity checks and AI-writing detection tools, to support editorial assessment. However, such tools are used only as support and not as the sole basis for decision-making. If inappropriate or undisclosed use of AI is suspected, the journal may request clarification, revisions, or supporting information, reject the manuscript, or initiate further investigation. Failure to comply with this policy may result in rejection, retraction, or other corrective actions.</p> <p>This policy will be periodically reviewed and updated in response to developments in AI technology and publishing standards. Authors, reviewers, and editors are encouraged to consult this policy before using AI tools and to contact the editorial office if clarification is needed.</p> en-US [email protected] (Prof. Burhanuddin, Ph.D) [email protected] (Ferril Irham Muzaki) Sat, 30 May 2026 23:30:58 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Gandong School Management for Interfaith Collaborative Learning https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/5068 <p>Religiously diverse schools require management models that transform difference into collaborative learning rather than merely maintaining formal tolerance. This study analyzes Gandong School Management as a locally grounded model of interfaith collaboration implemented by SMA Kristen Rehoboth Ambon and SMA Al-Hilaal Ambon. The study employed a qualitative multi-site design involving principals, teachers, administrative staff, students, and parents selected through snowball sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation of programs, meeting notes, student reflections, and the interschool memorandum of understanding. The data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis supported by thematic coding. The findings show that Gandong School Management was initiated through reflective leadership, cross-cultural religious literacy, and a formal interschool agreement. It was then institutionalized through task distribution, teacher coordination, student reflection, shared religious-cultural activities, collaborative projects, and stakeholder support. The program strengthened students' openness, tolerance, empathy, and intergroup interaction, while also improving teachers' collaborative professionalism and the inclusiveness of school services. The study concludes that Gandong School Management functions as a contextual form of collaborative school management that integrates local wisdom, interfaith literacy, and whole-school governance. The study implies that culturally rooted interschool partnerships can serve as a practical strategy for peace education and multicultural school leadership.</p> Lifia Meiliza Wiyono, Rudolf Kempa, Paul Arjanto, Seng Tong Chong Copyright (c) 2026 International Research-Based Education Journal https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/5068 Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000 The Skill Mismatch and Economic Returns of STEM vs. Non-STEM Degrees in Cambodia https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/5238 <p>This article examines the relationship between skill mismatch and the economic returns to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) versus non-STEM degrees in Cambodia. Using an integrative literature review grounded in human capital theory, signaling theory, and the assignment model, it synthesizes evidence from national labor surveys, international development reports, and emerging Cambodian scholarship. The review finds that STEM graduates earn a modest wage premium in formal employment, but that a large informal sector, a narrow industrial base, and weak quality assurance compress this premium well below theoretical predictions. Non-STEM graduates, especially in education, law, and the social sciences, face severe overeducation and horizontal mismatch yet continue to enroll. The article concludes that reform must simultaneously address graduate supply and the economy’s absorptive capacity, and offers recommendations for the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, universities, and private-sector stakeholders.</p> Sam Ean Lay, Vuddneath Som, Sothearak Lum Copyright (c) 2026 International Research-Based Education Journal https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/5238 Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Challenges and Opportunities in Inclusive Animation Education to Improve the Skills of the Deaf https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/4773 <p>Today's universities are required to provide a fair and diverse learning environment, including providing equal opportunities for people with disabilities to access higher education. One group facing significant obstacles is the deaf, who have a strong interest in creative fields but lack adequate access to education and technology. Furthermore, many university instructors still do not understand the need for inclusive education, resulting in students with disabilities often attending regular classes with the same teaching approach as other students. This situation creates a learning gap and prompted a study to develop a new approach to teaching inclusive 2D animation for the deaf community in Malang City. Participants in this activity were 12 deaf survivors aged 20–30 years from GERKATIN. The activity was implemented using a participatory, project-based learning approach through five stages: (1) observation, (2) intensive animation workshop, (3) interviews, (4) evaluation, and (5) designing a sustainability strategy through the formation of a deaf animation learning community. The results of the activity showed an increase in the participants' abilities, although a number of obstacles remained in the implementation of inclusive animation learning. These findings can be input for the development of inclusive education and provide contributions through animation teaching models that have the potential to be applied in various contexts.</p> Ayyub Anshari Sukmaraga, Sultan Arif Rahmadianto, Nuril Kusuma Wardani, Jeremy Pierre Antoine Copyright (c) 2026 International Research-Based Education Journal https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/4773 Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Digital Era Teacher Performance: The Influence of TPACK and Transformational Leadership https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/4162 <p>This research aimed to examine the influence of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and school principal leadership on teaching performance in the digital era at State Junior High Schools in Trenggalek District, Trenggalek Regency. This research involved 165 State Junior High School teachers as the population. Using a simple random sampling technique, 117 State Junior High School teachers in Trenggalek District were selected as the research sample. This research used closed-ended questionnaires to collect data. The data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and inferential methods, including Pearson’s correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis. Research findings indicate that, TPACK and transformational principal leadership partially influence teaching performance in the digital era. Simultaneously, both TPACK and transformational principal leadership influence teaching performance in the digital era. Based on these results, it can be concluded that it is important to improve teacher capabilities through both TPACK and the quality of transformational leadership support from principals in order to improve teaching performance in the digital era.</p> Emi Eka Safitri, Raden Bambang Sumarsono, Dedi Prestiadi, Ahmad Nurabadi Copyright (c) 2026 International Research-Based Education Journal https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/4162 Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Strategic Management in Innovation of Educational Curriculum Implementation in Schools https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/5178 <p>This study aims to analyze the application of strategic management in supporting the innovation of multidimensional curriculum implementation at IIBS Thursina School, Malang. In facing global challenges and local demands, IIBS Thursina integrates six curricula—the Merdeka Curriculum, Cambridge, Al-Azhar, Madrasah, Medina, and Tahfiz—into a holistic education system based on Islamic values ​​and international standards. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The results show that management strategies including collaborative planning, dynamic scheduling, strengthening human resources, and utilizing digital technology are key factors in the successful implementation of the curriculum. The findings also indicate a positive impact on improving academic achievement, character building, and institutional reputation. This study concludes that contextual and integrative strategic management can accommodate the complexity of the curriculum and strengthen the competitiveness of Islamic educational institutions in the global era.</p> Mohammed Shehada, Hamza A.H Shehada, Baligh Al Hajj, Zohaib Hassan Sain Copyright (c) 2026 International Research-Based Education Journal https://journal-fip.um.ac.id/index.php/irbej/article/view/5178 Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000