Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Development of Critical Thinking in Deaf Students: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Finland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um005v10i12026p242-253Keywords:
Deaf education, Critical thinking, Cross-cultural, Indonesia, Finland, inclusive education, Systematic literature reviewAbstract
This study examines how cultural context shapes the development of critical thinking skills in deaf students through a comparative cross-cultural analysis of Indonesia and Finland. Although critical thinking is recognized as a core 21st-century competency, it remains underexplored in deaf education, particularly from a cross-cultural perspective. The research employed a qualitative, descriptive, and comparative design. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and analysed using comparative thematic analysis. Trustworthiness was ensured through source and method triangulation, peer debriefing with inclusive education experts, and member checking with participants. Participants included secondary-level deaf students, special education (SLB) teachers, and inclusive teachers in both countries. Findings reveal that education in Indonesia tends to be teacher-centred and hierarchical, limiting opportunities for dialogue and critical inquiry among deaf students. In contrast, Finland’s egalitarian and student-centred educational culture—supported by bilingual education (Finnish Sign Language and written/spoken Finnish), technology integration, and phenomenon-based learning—offers stronger conditions for fostering critical thinking. Psychological factors such as self-esteem and resilience were found to be shaped by cultural practices and systemic support. This study provides one of the first cross-cultural analyses linking culture, deaf education, and critical thinking development. It underscores the importance of cultural accessibility, particularly in language and pedagogy, in promoting higher-order thinking skills among deaf students. The findings suggest that inclusive education in Indonesia could be strengthened through culturally responsive pedagogy, bilingual approaches, and technology-enhanced learning. The study also proposes a novel cross-cultural model connecting educational culture, language access, and psychological factors to the development of critical thinking in deaf students, and recommends further empirical research across diverse cultural contexts.
References
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
Antia, S. D., Jones, P. B., Reed, S., & Kreimeyer, K. H. (2020). Academic status and progress of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 25(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enaa014
Bjork, C. (2020). Local responses to decentralization policy in Indonesia. Comparative Education Review, 64(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1086/707567
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Brookhart, S. M. (2020). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Eldiva, F. T. (2019). Project based learning in improving critical thinking skill of children with special needs. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 296, 349–354. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icset-19.2019.70
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Hayati, R., & Dahliana, S. (2019). Penelitian deskriptif dalam Pendidikan [Descriptive research in education].
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka dan implementasinya [The Merdeka Curriculum and its implementation].
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Marschark, M., & Knoors, H. (2020). Educating deaf learners: Creating a global evidence base. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190054045.001.0001
OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Qi, S., & Mitchell, R. E. (2022). Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Past, present, and future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 27(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enab046
Qi, S., & Mitchell, R. E. (2022). Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 27(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enab046
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish education reform and its implications. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09268-1
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D [Educational research methods: Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D approaches]. Alfabeta.
Sunardi, S., Yusuf, M., Gunarhadi, G., Priyono, P., & Yeager, J. L. (2021). The implementation of inclusive education for students with special needs in Indonesia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1742582
Sunardi, S., Yusuf, M., Gunarhadi, G., Priyono, P., & Yeager, J. L. (2021). Inclusive education in Indonesia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1742582
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Yusuf, M. (2020). Purposive sampling dalam penelitian pendidikan inklusif [Purposive sampling in inclusive education research]. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 4(1), 45–56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of ICSAR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





