Pedagogical Gaps in Teaching Braille Quran Reading to Visually Impaired Children

Authors

  • Safaruddin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Budi Susetyo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Imas Diana Aprilia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Iding Tarsidi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Rike Rizki Mahara Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um029v13i12026p31-40

Keywords:

braille Qur'an, visually impaired children, pedagogical gap, braille literacy, tactile learning, reception learning

Abstract

Teaching Braille Qur'an reading to visually impaired children was a critical issue in special education and Islamic religious education, as it directly impacted students' access to religious literacy, independent learning, and spiritual participation. This article aimed to analyze pedagogical gaps in Braille Qur'an reading instruction based on a conceptual review of the characteristics of visually impaired children, the complexity of Braille literacy, and the prevailing tendency toward technically focused learning. The method used was a conceptual study employing a narrative literature review approach of internationally reputable literature from the past 10 years discussing Braille literacy, education for children with visual impairments, tactile learning, assistive technology, and meaningful learning. The results indicated that pedagogical gaps emerged in five main forms. First, instruction remained heavily oriented toward technical decoding, with little attention to students' conceptual understanding of Qur'anic text. Second, tactile experience was rarely scaffolded into coherent cognitive organization, leaving students unable to construct meaning from what they felt. Third, the complexity of Braille Qur'an symbols was frequently introduced without a structured learning sequence, overwhelming students before foundational skills were secured. Fourth, auditory approaches often overshadowed tactile reinforcement, creating dependency on listening rather than active reading. Fifth, the design of existing learning models failed to accommodate students' diverse individual needs, resulting in a one-size-fits-all approach that undermined meaningful participation. This article concluded that Braille Qur'an reading instruction needed to be directed toward a more explicitly structured and meaningful model, so that students were not only able to recite the text but also understand the relationship between Braille symbols, the sounds of the Hijaiyah letters, vowel marks, and the overall structure of the Qur'anic text

References

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024). Ausubel's Meaningful Learning Revisited. Current Psychology, 43, 4579–4598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4

Croake, K., Gentle, F., & Duncan, J. (2025). Evidence-Based Pedagogy Used to Teach Beginning Readers Braille in a Mainstream Setting: A Scoping Review. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 43(2), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196241250200

Dursin, A. G. (2022). Information Design and Education for Visually Impaired and Blind People. The Design Journal, 25(5), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2088099

Gurnani, B., & Kaur, K. (2025). Braille Literacy and Visual Disabilities. In G. Bennett & E. Goodall (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_522-1

Holbrook, M. C., McCarthy, T., & Kamei-Hannan, C. (2017). Foundations of Education, Vol. 1: History and Theory of Teaching Children and Youths with Visual Impairments (3rd ed.). AFB Press.

Hoskin, E., Coyne, M. K., White, M. J., Dobri, S. C. D., Davies, T. C., & Pinder, S. D. (2022). Effectiveness of Technology for Braille Literacy Education for Children: A Systematic Review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2070676

Kana, F. Y., & Hagos, A. T. (2025). Factors Hindering the use of Braille for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Visual Impairments: A Systematic Review. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196241239173

Long, L., & Bjorg, R. (2025). Methods of Tactile Reading and Writing for Students with Visual Impairments. In J. P. Bakken (Ed.), Handbook for Educating Students with Disabilities (pp. 521–540). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60258-0_26

Siuda-Krzywicka, K., Bola, Ł., Paplińska, M., Jednoróg, K., & Szwed, M. (2024). How Learning to Read Braille in Visual and Tactile Domains Reorganizes the Sighted Brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, Article 1297344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1297344

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Syumarlin, Ritonga, M., & Halim, S. (2021). Alquran Learning Model for Blind Students. Tarbawi Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.29406/tbw.v7i2.3409

Töteberg-Harms, M., Schuster, A. K., & Elflein, H. M. (2023). A Systematic Review of the Impact of Childhood Vision Impairment on Reading and Literacy Outcomes. Journal of Optometry, 16(4), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2023.04.003

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the Past snd Present to Explore the Future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Vallori, A. B. (2014). Meaningful Learning in Practice. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 189–197.

Zebehazy, K. T., & Holbrook, M. C. (2025). Understanding Braille and Braille Readers to Facilitate Inclusion snd Foster a Sense Of Belonging. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X241307603

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

Issue

Section

Articles