The Effect of Neurocognitive Mobilisation on Attention and Response to Instruction of Students with Physical Disabilities in the Intervention Class

Authors

  • Anik Agustin Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Indah Putri Pratiwi Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Devi Maulida Rahmah Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Sinta Yuni Susilawati Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um029v13i12026p41-48

Keywords:

neurocognitive mobilisation, attention, response to instruction, single subject research, special education

Abstract

This research examined the impact of neurocognitive mobilisation on the attention and responsiveness to classroom instruction of BS, a student with motor impairments enrolled at SLB Negeri 1 Gianyar. The study employed a quantitative methodology using a Single Subject Research (SSR) design with A–B phases, comprising an initial baseline stage followed by an intervention stage. Data collection was conducted through systematic classroom observations using an instrument designed to evaluate several behavioral indicators, including attention, concentration, motor coordination, motor control, and responses to teacher instructions across the intervention period. The validity of the observation instrument was assessed using Aiken's V, yielding a coefficient of 1.00, which indicates excellent content validity. Reliability was examined through Interobserver Agreement (IOA) to ensure consistency between observers. Comparison of the baseline and intervention phases revealed notable improvements in the participant's performance after the implementation of neurocognitive mobilisation. These improvements were reflected by an upward trend in scores, stable behavioral patterns during the intervention phase, and a relatively low percentage of overlapping data (20%) between phases. Overall, the findings suggest that neurocognitive mobilisation has the potential to enhance attention, active participation during classroom learning, and responsiveness to instructional cues among students with motor impairments in special education contexts. However, because the study involved only a single participant, the results should be interpreted with caution. Future research is recommended to include a larger number of participants and apply more robust research designs to provide stronger empirical support and improve the broader applicability of the findings

References

Berns, C., Brüchle, W., Scho, S., Schneefeld, J., Schneider, U., & Rosenkranz, K. (2020). Intensity Dependent Effect of Cognitive Training on Motor Cortical Plasticity and Cognitive Performance in Humans. Experimental Brain Research, 238(12), 2805–2818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05933-5

Doyen, C., Renou, S., Burnouf, I., Baron, T., Amado, I., Launay, C., & Kaye, K. (2020). La remédiation cognitive pour l’inclusion des enfants et des adolescents avec troubles du neurodéveloppement et/ou émotionnels [Cognitive Remediation for the Inclusion of Children and Adolescents with Neurodevelopmental and/or Emotional Disorders]. Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence, 68(4), 196–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurenf.2020.03.005

Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., Mcgee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203

Li, K., Wang, Y., Wu, Z., Yao, X., & Fan, Y. (2023). Effectiveness of Active Exergames for Improving Cognitive Function in Patients with Neurological Disabilities: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Games for Health Journal, 12(3), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2022.0134

Pappa, K., Biswas, V., Flegal, K. E., Evans, J. J., & Baylan, S. (2020). Working Memory Updating Training Promotes Plasticity & Behavioural Gains: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.027

Parikh, V., & Bangasser, D. A. (2020). Cholinergic Signaling Dynamics and Cognitive Control of Attention. Behavioral Pharmacology of the Cholinergic System, 45, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2020_133

Perry, C. M., Singh, T., Springer, K. G., Harrison, A. T., McLain, A. C., & Herter, T. M. (2020). Multiple Processes Independently Predict Motor Learning. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17(151), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00766-3

Samuelson, K. W., Engle, K., Abadjian, L., Jordan, J., Bartel, A., Talbot, M., Powers, T., Bryan, L., & Benight, C. (2020). Cognitive Training for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.569005

Stern, Y. (2009). Cognitive Reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2015–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004

Tadmouri, A., Champagnat, J., & Morin‐Surun, M. P. (2014). Activation of Microglia and Astrocytes in the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius During Ventilatory Acclimatization to 10% Hypoxia in Unanesthetized Mice. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 92(5), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23336

Weyandt, L. L., Clarkin, C. M., Holding, E. Z., May, S. E., Marraccini, M. E., Gudmundsdottir, B. G., Shepard, E., & Thompson, L. (2020). Neuroplasticity in Children and Adolescents in Response to Treatment Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience, 4(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183X20974231

Wolery, M., Busick, M., Reichow, B., & Barton, E. E. (2010). Comparison of Overlap Methods for Quantitatively Synthesizing Single-Subject Data. The Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908328009

Wolff, L., Quan, Y., Perry, G., & Forde Thompson, W. (2023). Music Engagement as a Source of Cognitive Reserve. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias®, 38, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/15333175231214833

Won, J., Nielson, K. A., & Smith, J. C. (2023). Large-Scale Network Connectivity and Cognitive Function Changes after Exercise Training in Older Adults with Intact Cognition and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease Reports, 7(1), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-220062

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

Issue

Section

Articles