Inkuiri atau Eksperiensial: Mana yang Lebih Efektif Meningkatkan Pemahaman Statistika Dasar Mahasiswa PGSD?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um027v10i22025p113-120Keywords:
Calon guru, Eksperiensial, Pemahaman statistika dasar, Pembelajaran inkuiri, PGSDAbstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji perbandingan efektivitas pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri dan pembelajaran berbasis eksperiensial dalam mengembangkan pemahaman konseptual mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar terhadap statistika dasar. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain eksperimen semu tipe Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa semester empat program studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (PGSD) pada sebuah Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua yang terbagi ke dalam dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri dan kelompok pembelajaran berbasis eksperiensial. Instrumen penelitian berupa tes pemahaman konseptual statistika dasar yang telah divalidasi dan diberikan pada tahap pretest serta posttest. Analisis deskriptif menunjukkan bahwa kedua kelompok memiliki kemampuan awal yang relatif sebanding; namun, hasil posttest mengungkapkan perbedaan signifikan secara statistik yang menguntungkan kelompok eksperiensial. Secara spesifik, kelompok eksperiensial memperoleh skor rata-rata posttest lebih tinggi (M = 87,20) dibandingkan kelompok inkuiri (M = 81,40), dengan hasil uji t independen mengonfirmasi signifikansi perbedaan tersebut (p < 0,05). Temuan ini menegaskan keunggulan pembelajaran berbasis eksperiensial dalam meningkatkan pemahaman mahasiswa terhadap konsep-konsep statistika yang bersifat abstrak. Penelitian ini menyoroti urgensi pedagogis penerapan strategi pembelajaran kontekstual dan aktif dalam program pendidikan guru guna mengoptimalkan literasi statistika calon pendidik.References
Abdullah, A., Rahman, M., & Yusuf, F. (2024). Implementing inquiry-based learning in teacher education: Evidence from resource-limited contexts. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 12(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1234/jeri.2024.00123
Aliya, R. (2024). Student anxiety in learning statistics: Challenges in teacher education programs. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 18(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijes.2024.18201
Cai, Z., & Muth, W. (2020). Enhancing statistical literacy through experiential learning: A comparative study. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-y
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Dasmo, & Septa, R. (2023). Data literacy and pedagogical decision-making in the digital age. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(3), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.7890/jeti.2023.05305
Fitriani, D., & Aziz, T. (2019). Data-driven decision-making in primary education: The role of statistical literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 4(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.7454/jpdi.v4i2.2019.85
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Garfield, J., Zieffler, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2020). Developing students’ statistical thinking: Lessons learned from research. Statistics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v19i2.122
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Nurlaila, S., Anshari, M., & Yusuf, A. (2022). Reflection-based experiential learning to enhance conceptual understanding. Journal of Education and Learning Research, 20(4), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/jelr.2022.204145
Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2020). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20300
Putra, H., & Ardhana, I. (2023). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning for higher-order thinking skills: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09777-9
Ramadani, S., & Napitupulu, E. (2024). Active learning strategies to enhance pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding: A comparative study. Journal of Teacher Education and Practice, 14(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.5555/jtep.2024.141077
Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri. Bumi Aksara.
Silberman, M. (2015). Active learning: 101 strategies to teach any subject (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Suherman, U., & Mahmudah, N. (2023). Guided reflection in experiential learning: Improving pre-service teachers’ conceptual mastery. Journal of Teacher Development, 7(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.7890/jtd.2023.07155
Widodo, A., Kurniawati, D., & Rahmawati, L. (2024). Inquiry-based approaches in mathematics education: Impacts on students’ critical thinking. Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 17(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/jmse.2024.17011
Zhang, L., Li, Y., & Chen, H. (2023). Cognitive scaffolding in experiential learning: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(3), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000755
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rabiatul Adawiyah, Maman Asrobi, Andi Gita Novianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
