Coding Learning Approaches for Early Childhood: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Bayu Widyaswara Suwahyo Balai Besar Guru Penggerak Provinsi Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v9i22024p66-78

Keywords:

early childhood education, computational thinking, coding, learning approaches, teaching media.

Abstract

As digital literacy becomes a core component of early childhood education, there's an increasing urgency to figure out how best to introduce computational thinking and programming to young learners. Despite growing interest, a clear gap remains: we still lack age-appropriate strategies and teaching tools that effectively support coding education at this developmental stage. This study tackles that gap through a systematic review of experimental research, focusing on how different teaching methods, learning media, and children's ages influence their ability to grasp coding concepts in early education settings. Drawing on data from four major academic databases—Scopus (436 articles), ScienceDirect (284), EBSCOhost (107), and Web of Science (86)—the review screened publications from 2020 to 2024. After applying rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 relevant experimental studies were selected for in-depth analysis. The findings highlight that tangible learning tools, such as physical coding toys, significantly enhance young children's comprehension. The teaching strategies reviewed fell into three broad categories: plugged-in (digital), unplugged (non-digital), and hybrid. Notably, age plays a critical role in how children engage with and understand coding, especially in instruction-heavy environments. While both plugged and unplugged approaches were beneficial, unplugged methods stood out as particularly effective thanks to their hands-on and developmentally appropriate nature.  Overall, this review adds meaningful insights to the field of early coding education and offers practical guidance for educators and policymakers looking to build responsive, age-sensitive curricula that foster digital readiness from an early age.

References

Aigerim, C., Nursultanovna, A. A., Askarovna, B. L., Kapalova, S. K., Sikinbayev, B. B., & Genc, Z. (2021). Evaluation of oral speech of students with hearing impairments with perspectives of special learning technologies. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(3), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i3.5958

Al-Khateeb, A. A., Alshurman, W. M., & Al-Saree, I. I. A. (2020). Emotional intelligence levels among hearing-impaired and visually impaired students in Jordan. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.395.406

Alfikri, R. H., Utomo, M. S., Februariyanti, H., & Nurwahyudi, E. (2022). Pembangunan aplikasi penerjemah bahasa isyarat dengan metode cnn berbasis android. Jurnal Teknoinfo, 16(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.33365/jti.v16i2.1752

Amka, A., & Mirnawati, M. (2020). Inclusive Practices: Strengthening Character Through Social Participation of Deaf Students. Pedagogia : Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v9i2.280

Dewi, P. A. C., Kristiantari, G. R. K., & Ganing N. N. (2021). Kontribusi Tindak Pembelajaran Guru Kelas 1 SD pada Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbicara Siswa. Indonesian Journal of Instruction, 2(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v2i2.44511

E, N. H. A. & Zul M. I., (2021). Aplikasi Penerjemah Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia menjadi Suara berbasis Android menggunakan Tensorflow. Jurnal Komputer Terapan, 7(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.35143/jkt.v7i1.4629

Frajtag, J. B. & J. D. J. (2017). Communication Problems and Quality of Life People with Hearing Loss. Global Journal of Otolaryngology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.19080/gjo.2017.10.555790

Ginting, D. (2015). Komunikasi Cerdas Panduan: Komunikasi di Dunia Kerja. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Haliza, Nur, Eko Kuntarto, A. K. (2020). Pemerolehan bahasa anak berkebutuhan khusus (tunarungu) dalam memahami bahasa. Jurnal Genre (Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya), 2(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.26555/jg.v2i1.2051

Holman, J. A., Drummond, A., Hughes, S. E., & Naylor, G. (2019). Hearing impairment and daily-life fatigue: a qualitative study. International Journal of Audiology, 58(7), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2019.1597284

Jaiyeola, M. T., & Adeyemo, A. A. (2018). Quality of life of deaf and hard of hearing students in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. PLoS ONE, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190130

Kissya, V. (2022). Penggunaan Bahasa Isyarat Dalam Komunikasi Antara Penyandang Tuna Rungu, Guru, Serta Keluarga Di (Sekolah Luar Biasa Pelita Kasih) Rumah Tiga Ambon. Hipotesa, 16(1), 18-34.

Luckner, J. L., & Movahedazarhouligh, S. (2019). Social-emotional interventions with children and youth who are deaf or hard of hearing: A research synthesis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eny030

Mamuriyah, N., & Deasy, D (2020). Perancangan Pembuatan Aplikasi Pengenalan dan Penerjemah Bahasa Isyarat SIBI Menggunakan Leap Motion dengan Hidden Markov Models. TELCOMATICS, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37253/telcomatics.v5i1.838

Nasri, A. (2020). Konversi Suara Ucapan Bahasa Indonesia ke Sistem Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia (SIBI). Jurnal Informatika, 2(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.26618/ainet.v2i2.4025

Direktorat PMPK. (2023, Oktober 24). Mengenal komunikasi nonverbal. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://pmpk.kemdikbud.go.id/read/post/mengenal-komunikasi-nonverbal.

Pohan, D. D., & Fitria, U. S. (2021). Jenis jenis komunikasi. Cybernetics: Journal Educational Research and Social Studies, 29-37.

Prakash, S. S., Prakash, S. G. R., Ravichandran, A., Susan, K. ., & Alex, W. (2013). Mothers of Children Using Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants : International Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 37–44.

Ryan. (2020). 4 Jenis Komunikasi. Ilmu Komunikasi-Program studi terbaik di Sumatera Utara. https://ilmukomunikasi.uma.ac.id/2020/11/23/4-jenis-komunikasi/

Sabaitytė, J., & Davidavičius, S. (2017). Challenges and solutions of adopting public electronic services for the needs of Z generation. International journal of learning and change, 9(1), 17-28.

Sari, I., & Altiarika, E. (2023). Sistem pengembangan bahasa isyarat untuk berkomunikasi dengan penyandang disabilitas (tunarungu). Journal of Information Technology and society, 1(1), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.35438/jits.v1i1.21

Sari, A. F. (2020). Etika komunikasi: Menanamkan pemahaman etika komunikasi kepada mahasiswa. TANJAK: Journal of Education and Teaching, 1(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.35961/tanjak.v1i2.152

Soleymani, Z., Mahmoodabadi, N., & Nouri, M. M. (2016). Language skills and phonological awareness in children with cochlear implants and normal hearing. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 83, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.01.013

World Health Organization. (2018). Addressing the rising prevelance of hearing loss.

Ziadat, A. H., & A. rahmneh A. A. (2020). The learning, social, and economic challenges facing the deaf and hearing-impaired individuals. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 976–988. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5130

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Suwahyo, B. W. (2024). Coding Learning Approaches for Early Childhood: A Systematic Review. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v9i22024p66-78

Issue

Section

Articles