The Influence of Blended Learning and Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) Learning Styles on Students' Speaking Skills in Class XI English Language Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v8i22023p113Keywords:
blended learning, visual, auditory, kinesthetic, students' speaking skillsAbstract
The aim of this research is to determine the effect of blended learning and visual, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning styles on students' speaking skills when learning English. The research method used is experimental research. The experimental design used was a factorial design, while this research used a non-equivalent control group pre-test. The research results show that: (1) There are differences in the English language skills of students who are taught through blended learning and online learning; (2) There is a reciprocal influence between blended learning and online learning models as well as visual, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning on students' English language skills; (3) There are differences in English language skills between students taught using blended learning and online learning with visual learning; ( 4) There are differences in English language skills between students who are taught through blended learning and online learning techniques, and students who receive auditory learning; and (5) There are differences in English language skills between students taught via blended learning and online learning methods and students with a kinesthetic learning style.
References
Abdullah, W. (2018). Model blended learning dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran. Fikrotuna, 7(1), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v7i1.3169
Asroji, A. (2014). Strategi peningkatan kompetensi berbicara bahasa Inggris siswa SMK Negeri 1 Pacitan tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Riset Manajemen, 1(1), 43–51. https://www.jurnal.stieww.ac.id/index.php/jrm/article/view/118
Daulay, U. A., Syarifudin, S., & Manurung, B. (2016). Pengaruh blended learning berbasis Edmodo dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada sistem peredaran darah manusia di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v6i1.4330
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 21 update PLS regresi. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gunawan, G., Kustiani, L., & Hariani, L. S. (2018). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pendidikan IPS, 12(1), 14–22.
Husamah. (2014). Pembelajaran bauran (blended learning). Prestasi Pustaka Raya.
Khoiroh, N. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran blended learning dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 Gumukmas. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v10i2.13986
Komar, A., & Winarsih, N. (2020). Problematika pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial di tingkat sekolah dasar: Studi kasus SDN Kebonsari Kulon 3 Kota Probolinggo tahun ajaran 2020–2021. Al-Fikru: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sains, 1(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.55210/al-fikru.v1i2.517
Lubis, M. Q. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran blended learning dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar PKn di kelas VII di SMP Panca Budi Medan [Universitas Negeri Medan]. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/26977
Maskar, S., & Wulantina, E. (2019). Persepsi peserta didik terhadap metode blended learning dengan Google Classroom. Inomatika (Inovasi Matematika), 1(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v1i2.156
Maulida, U. (2020). Konsep blended learning berbasis Edmodo di era new normal. Dirasah: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 3(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.51476/dirasah.v3i02.192
Muhson, A. (2010). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v8i2.949
Nadziroh, F. (2017). The analysis of effectiveness of e-learning based learning system. Journal of Computer Science and Visual Communication Design, 2(1), 1–14.
Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 46–55. http://academic-conferences.org/ejournals.htm
Octavia, S. (2020). Model-model pembelajaran. Deepublish.
Setiawan, T. H. (2020). Efektivitas penerapan blended learning dalam upaya meningkatkan kemampuan akademik mahasiswa melalui jejaring Schoology di masa pandemi COVID-19. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 3(5), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i5.p493-506
Suciono, W. (2021). Berpikir kritis (Tinjauan melalui kemandirian belajar, kemampuan akademik, dan efikasi diri). Penerbit Adab.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Supriyadi, & Subiantoro, H. (2021). Blended learning sebagai strategi peningkatan kualitas dan inovasi pembelajaran berbasis kebutuhan peserta didik SMK Negeri 2 Jiwan pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Vokasi dan Teknik Otomotif, 3(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.37340
Suyanto. (2014). Pelaksanaan pendidikan di Indonesia memasuki milenium II. Adi Cita.
Utama, D. P. (2019). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran blended learning dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas X SMK 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath: Jurnal Edukasi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.25139/smj.v7i2.1127
Wondo, M. T. S., Meli, M. F., & Seto, S. B. (2022). Analisis sikap rasa ingin tahu mahasiswa selama COVID-19 menggunakan model blended learning. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 1953–1961. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1426
Yustiani, D. K., & Zahwa, N. (2020). Peran guru dalam pembelajaran pada siswa sekolah dasar. Fondatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v4i1.515
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
