Perilaku Komunikasi Nonvebal: Dosen Terbaik dan Dosen Terburuk
Keywords:
teacher nonverbal communication behavior; student’s perception; student’s culture; effective teachingAbstract
This study aims to determine whether lecturers perceived as the best or worst based on their nonverbal communication behaviors are influenced by students’ cultural backgrounds. Employing an ex post facto design, the independent variable was the type of lecturers’ nonverbal communication behavior, categorized into the Best Lecturer and the Worst Lecturer. The dependent variable was students’ perceptions of lecturers’ nonverbal communication behavior, with students’ ethnic backgrounds (Javanese, East Nusa Tenggara, and Madurese) serving as the moderating variable. The participants were students from four study programs. Data were collected using the Nonverbal Immediacy Measure (NIM) questionnaire, with 203 valid responses analyzed. A mean difference test was used to examine perceptual differences, and the Kruskal–Wallis One-Way ANOVA was employed to test the hypotheses. The results indicate that there is no significant difference in students’ perceptions of lecturers’ nonverbal communication behavior between the best and worst lecturers across different cultural backgrounds.
References
Alen, M., B., J., Mabry, E., Burrell, N.A., & Timmerman C. E. (2006). Comparing Distance Education to Face-to-Face Methods of education. In Gayle, B.M., Preiss, R.W., Burrell, N. & Allen, M. (Eds.), Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances Through Meta-Analysis. (pp. 229-244). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publisher.
Aminullah. (2014). Model Komunikasi Antarbudaya Antara Etnik Madura dan Etnik Melayu di Kelurahan Roban Singkawang Kalimantan Barat. Tesis, Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”. Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://repository.upnyk.ac.id/view/divisions/sch=5Fkom/2014.html.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2006) How Instructor Immediacy Behaviors Affect Student Satisfaction and Learning in Web-Based Courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, Retrieved from http://www.alnresearch.org/data_files/articles/full_text/arbaugh01.pdf
Babad, E. (2005). Guessing Teachers’ Differential Treatment Of High- And Low-Achievers From Thin Slices Of Their Public Lecturing Behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2) 124-134.
Baringer, D. K., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Immediacy in the Classroom: Student Immediacy. Communication Education 49, 178-186.
Baylor, A.L., and Kim, S. (2009). Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more. Computer in Human Behavior 25 (2009) 450-457
Bunga, B. N. (2007). Budaya Korea dan Bima Melalui Perspektif Geert Hofstede. Makalah perkuliahan. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada. (0nline)
Chesebro, J. L. & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The Relationship of Teacher Clarity and Immediacy with Student State Receiver Apprehension, Affect, and Cognitive Learning. Communication Education 50(1), 59-68.
Degeng, N. S. (2013). Ilmu Pembelajaran: Klasifikasi Variabel untuk Pengembangan Teori dan Penelitian.
Etika Bisnis. 2012. Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Retrieved from http://etikabisnis.blogspot.com/2012/02/komunikasi-antar-budaya.html. diakses Januari 2015
Georgakopoulos, Alexia and Guerrero, Laura K. (2010). Student Perceptions of Teachers’ Nonverbal and Verbal Communication: A Comparison of Best and Worst Professors across Six Cultures. International Education Studies 3(2), 3-16.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviour, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hurt, H. Thomas, S., Michael D. and McCroskey, J.C. (1978). Communication in the Classroom.
Kurniawan, A.P., & Hasanat, N.U. (2007). Perbedaan Ekspresi Emosi pada Beberapa Tingkat Generasi Suku Jawa di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol.34 (1): 1-17.
Maniyeni, A.M.D. (2002). Karakteristik Perilaku Komunikasi Nonverbal Dosen Universitas Artha Wacana Kupang Berdasarkan Empat Etnis di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Tesis, Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Matsumoto, D. (2006). Culture and Nonverbal Behavior. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Nonverbal Communication (219-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H.C. (2013). Cultural Similarities and Differences in Emblematic Gestures. Journal Nonverbal Behavior (2013) 37:1–27
McCroskey, J.C., Richmond, V.P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J.M. and Barraclough, R.A. (1995). A Cross-cultural and Multi-Behavioral Analysis of the Relationship between Nonverbal Immediacy and Teacher Evaluation. Communication Education 44, 281-290
McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., and Barraclough, R. A. (1996). Nonverbal Immediacy and Cognitive Learning: A Cross-cultural Investigation. Communication Education, 45: 200-211.
McDuff, D., Girard, J.M., & Kaliouby, R.E. (2017). Large-Scale Observational Evidence of Cross-Cultural Differences in Facial Behavior. Journal Nonverbal Behavior (2017) 41:1–19
Merkin, R.S. & Ramadan, R. (2016). Communication practices in the US and Syria. SpringerPlus (2016) 5:845
Pflug, J. (2011). Contextuality and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Cross Cultural Comparison. Computer in Human Behavior 27(2011) 131-137.
Richmond, V., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. (1987). The Relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed). Communication Yearbook, 10, (pp. 574-590) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rohmiati. (2011). Stereotip dan Prasangka dalam Komunikasi Antar Etnis (Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis Komunikasi antara Budaya). Jurnal ISIP. Retrieved from http://www.iisip.ac.id/content/stereotip-dan-prasangka-dalam-komunikasi-antar-etnis-suatu-tinjauan-teoritis-komunikasi-anta.
Seob, Kim Geung. (2014). Komunikasi Antara Budaya Korea dan Indonesia: Kajian tentang Perilaku Masyarakat Korea dan Jawa. Pusat Studi Korea, Universitas Gajah Mada. Retrieved from elisa1.ugm.ac.id/.../komunikasi%20antarbudaya.doc.
Thepsoonthorn, C., Yokozuka, T., Miura, S., Ogawa K., & Miyake, Y. (2016). Prior Knowledge Facilitates Mutual Gaze Convergence and Head Nodding Synchrony in Face-to-face Communication. 1Scientific RepoRts | 6:38261 | DOI: 10.1038/srep38261. Retrieved from www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Sitompul, N.C. (2014). Karakteristik Perilaku Nonverbal Guru Peserta Program Profesi Keguruan Sekolah Dasar (PPGSD) pada Praktek Mengajar di Laboratorium Microteaching. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran, Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang 22 November 2014. Retrieved from (http://pasca.um.ac.id
Valencic, K. M., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (2005). The Relationship between Teachers’ Temperament and Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Communication Behavior, Retrieved from http://www.JamesCMcCroskey.com/electronic/002.htm
Ugurel, Merih. (2010). Differences between Teacher’s Nonverbal Communication in Different Cultures. Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2010-08-1704.
