Penelitian dan Pengembangan E-Module Geometri Berdasarkan Fase Pembelajaran Geometri

Authors

  • Vina Muthmainna Rianto Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Punaji Setyosari Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Sulton Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i22021p288

Keywords:

e-module, geometry, phases of learning geometry

Abstract

The concept of learning geometry is based on phases of learning geometry, by Van Hiele, which enhances about students’ levels of geometric thinking. Drafting geometry e-module based on phases of learning geometry becomes one of the teaching materials and has a role in online and offline learning. This study focuses on developing a geometry e-module, on quadrilaterals. The development model used ADDIE by Branch. The research is participated by 18 students of grade VII in secondary school on Malang. The product has been validated by experts, which were perfectly valid. Meanwhile, the effect of the e-module is determined by looking at the gain score, was 0.3, which indicates that geometry e-module is quite effective in enhancing learning outcomes of quadrilaterals and implemented in classroom or distance learning.

References

Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). The Activities Based on Van Hiele’s Phase-Based Learning: Experts’ and Preservice Teachers’ Views. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 8(3), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2012.385.395

Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013a). Enhancing Students’ Level of Geometric Thinking Through Van Hiele’s Phase-based Learning. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 6(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2013/v6i5.13

Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013b). The Effects of Van Hiele’s Phases of Learning Geometry on Students’ Degree of Acquisition of Van Hiele Levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.740

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Argaswari, D. P. A. D. (2018). Penelitian dan Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Geometri Berbasis Teori Van Hiele. HISTOGRAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v2i2.211

Arsyad. (2009). Media Pembelajaran. PT Grafindo Persada.

Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, W., Anwar, K., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). Effectivenes of Using E-Module and E-Assessment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 13(09), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.11016

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Cahyaningrum, A. O. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Ditinjau Dari Level Berpikir. Publikasi Ilmiah, 10. http://v2.eprints.ums.ac.id/archive/etd/44619/2/4

Clark, R. E., & Salomon, G. (2011). Media Theory. In R. C. Richey, J. D. Klein, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The Instructional Design Knowledge Base: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 84–101). Routledge.

Connolly, S. (2010). The Impact of van Hiele-based Geometry Instruction on Student Understanding. St. John Fisher College.

Depdiknas. (2008). Penulisan Modul. Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction (Eighth edition). Pearson.

Dongwi, B. L. (2014). Using the Van Hiele Phases of Instruction to Inform the Design and Implementation of a Circle Geometry Teaching and Learning Programme. In Namibia Counts: Mathematics Education Research in Namibia (pp. 107–119). Digital Print Solutions. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333647851

Fuys, D. J., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. W. (1984). English Translation of Selected Writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele. ERIC.

Graesser, A. C., Chipman, P., & King, B. G. (2011). Media Theory. In R. C. Richey, J. D. Klein, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The Instructional Design Knowledge Base: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 84–101). Routledge.

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hanafi, M. A. (2017). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Geometri Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 3, 273–283. http://journal.uncp.ac.id/index.php/proceeding/article/view/797

Indrayany, E. S., & Lestari, F. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Dan Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Siswa Ditinjau Dari Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v5i2.13729

Ismail. (2009). Fase-Fase Pembelajaran Geometri. In Purwoko (Ed.), Teori Belajar Van Hiele. Konsorsium PJJ S1 PGSD.

Jones, K. (2002). Issues in the Teaching and Learning of Geometry. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Aspects of Teaching Secondary Mathematics: Perspectives on practice (pp. 121–139). RoutledgeFalmer.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Nomor 58, Tahun 2014, tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) / Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs).

Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of Text Illustrations: A Review of Research. Educational Communication and Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 30(4), 195–232.

Midgett, C. W., & Eddins, S. K. (2001). NCTM’s Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: Implications for Administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 85(623), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650108562305

Musdi, E., & Gusnita, N. (2018). Development of Mathematical Learning Devices Using Van Hiele Theory in Geometry of The Students In Grade VIII Secondary High School. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education 2018 (ICM2E 2018), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.2991/icm2e-18.2018.14

Musser, G. L., Burger, W. F., & Peterson, B. E. (2013). Mathematics for Elementary Teachers (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Purwoko. (2009). Teori Belajar Van Hiele. In Elang K (Ed.), Paket Bahan Ajar PJJ S1 PGSD. Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.

Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Prenadamedia Group.

Siew, N. M., Chong, C. L., & Abdullah, M. R. (2013). Facilitating Students’ Geometric Thinking Through Van Hiele’s Phase-Based Learning Using Tangram. Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.3844/jsssp.2013.101.111

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russel, J. D. (2011). Teknologi Pembelajaran dan Media untuk Belajar (A. Rahman, Trans.). Prenadamedia Group.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Sutama, I. K., Suharta, I. G. P., & Suweken, G. (2014). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Geometri SMA Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele Berbantuan Wingeom Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesia, 3(1), 1-14.

Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan Abad Ke-21: Keterampilan yang Diajarkan Melalui Pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dengan Tema “Isu-Isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21", 21, 2–3.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-02

How to Cite

Rianto, V. M., Setyosari, P., & Sulton. (2021). Penelitian dan Pengembangan E-Module Geometri Berdasarkan Fase Pembelajaran Geometri. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i22021p288

Issue

Section

Articles