Academic Quality Culture: Influence on Student Learning Concentration through Learning Management System-Based Classroom Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v11i12026p29-41Keywords:
Academic Quality Culture, Learning Concentration, Learning Management System, Classroom Management, Higher EducationAbstract
This research is aimed at investigating the effect of academic quality culture on student learning concentration with LMS-based classroom management as an intervening variable in higher education. There is a signficant amount of research on academic quality and digital learning environments. However little empirical evidence exists to cliffhanger how the institutional culture of quality manifests through technology-mediated pedagogical practices in shaping attentional engagement. Based on a quantitative survey design using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS, the study obtained data collected from 391 undergraduate students of Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Pakuan Bogor, Indonesia through proportionate stratified random sampling represented by six study programs. Academic quality culture (30 items, α = 0.91), LMS-based classroom management (28 items, α = 0.89), and learning concentration (30 items, α = 0.93) were measured with validated instruments. The results demonstrate that the effect of academic quality culture on learning concentration (β = 0.34, p < 0.01) and LMS-based classroom management (β = 0.52, p < 0.01) is direct for both types of effects in this model LMS-based classroom management has a positive impact on learning concentration (β = 0.41, p < 0.01), which partially mediates the relationship between academic quality culture and learning concentration (indirect effect = 0.213, p < 0.01). The variance explained in learning concentration is 58.6% by the model. The results indicate that developing a high-quality academic culture promotes student attention directly and indirectly as well, by enhancing pedagogical management via LMS. Implication of this study contributes an innovative integrative framework connecting institutional quality culture, classroom management, cognitif learning outcomes, and student learning concentration at higher education in Indonesia.
References
Ahmad, M., Syam, A. R., Haryanto, R., Ginting, K. R., Fatimatuzzahro, A., Hidayat, A., ... & Kelabur, A. A. S. (2026). Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Ponorogo: Najaha.
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Bendermacher, G. W. G., oude Egbrink, M. G. A., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2017). Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review. Higher Education, 73(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9979-2
Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., & Stensaker, B. (2016). Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 950–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052775
Casto, A. R. (2019). Empowered educators: how high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. In Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education (Vol. 49, Issue 6). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1552428
Cavique, L., & Ramos, M. R. (2024). Assessment in Collaborative Learning: a Mediation Analysis Approach. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 24(80). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.606551
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deng, R., & Benckendorff, P. (2021). What are the key themes associated with the positive learning experience in MOOCs? An empirical investigation of learners’ ratings and reviews. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00244-3
Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student Satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (2020). The Impact of College on Students. In The Impact of College on Students. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429339059
Greenhow, C., & Galvin, S. (2020). Teaching with social media: Evidence-based strategies for making remote higher education less remote. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0138
Gregory, J. L. (2019). Applying SERVQUAL: Using service quality perceptions to improve student satisfaction and program image. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(4), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2018-0268
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
H Hsu, S. W., & Lamb, P. (2020). Still in search of learning organization? Towards a radical account of The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. The learning organization, 27(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2019-0142
Kindle, P. A. (2018). Using Evidence of Student Learning to Improve Higher Education. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 23(1), 289-291. https://doi.org/10.18084/1084-7219.23.1.br289
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report, 23(1), 1–17.
Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of readiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning, 24(2), 38–58.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85–139). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
PH, & Chang, Y. C. (2009). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research Design (Vol. 4, Issue June). Sage publications.
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
Picton, T. W., Campbell, K. B., Baribeau-Braun, J., & Proulx, G. B. (2022). The neurophysiology of human attention: a tutorial review. Attention and Performance VII, 429–467.
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Selwyn, N. (2021). Ed-Tech Within Limits: Anticipating educational technology in times of environmental crisis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(5), 496–510.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022951
Seyfried, M., & Pohlenz, P. (2020). Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness. In Impact evaluation of quality management in higher education (pp. 24–37). Routledge.
Sumarni, S., Nasir, M., Syam, A. R., & Ampry, E. S. (2021). Improving Education Quality Improvement Through Organizational Culture. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Internasional.
Sutapa, M., Syam, A. R., Arifin, I., & Bafadal, I. (2025). Learning Leadership in Building a Culture of Information Technology in Elementary Schools. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 9(3), 678–688. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v9i3.35
Syam, A. R., & Arifin, S. (2019). Quality of Educational Services in Islam Perspective. In WESTECH 2018: Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology, WESTECH 2018, December 8th, 2018, Medan, Indonesia (Vol. 439). European Alliance for Innovation.
Syam, A. R., Listyasari, W. D., Sari, C. M., Mayasari, L. I., & Ahmad, I. F. (2025). Improving the Quality of Academic Work of Master’s Students in Educational Management at Universitas Negeri Jakarta Based on Online Workshops. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Bisma), 3(2), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.61159/bisma.v3i2.655
Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1997.11779003
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w
Umbase, R. S. (2023). Management of quality assurance and development of the quality culture of higher education in Indonesia. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6(4), 2023032. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023032
Wammes, J. D., & Smilek, D. (2017). Examining the influence of lecture format on degree of mind wandering. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.015
Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G.-J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
