Designing an SKKNI-Aligned Learning Ecosystem for Employability: A Competency-Clustering Framework for MICE Certification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v11i22026p248-266Keywords:
Learning Ecosystem, Employability, Competency Clustering, SKKNI, MICE CertificationAbstract
MICE certification requires a learning ecosystem that connects training providers, professional certification bodies, assessors, industry, professional communities, digital technology, and project experience. The initial proposal treated learning ecosystems, employability, and competency clustering as equivalent causal variables, creating a conceptual inconsistency because clustering is an analytical technique rather than a latent construct. This conceptual article develops a more coherent framework in which the learning ecosystem predicts employability directly and indirectly through MICE competency attainment, while clustering is used to map competency profiles. The study combines theory synthesis with directed analysis of 114 competency units in Indonesian Minister of Manpower Decision No. 123/2024, publicly available BNSP certification schemes, and literature on work-based learning, employability, scale development, PLS-SEM, and cluster validation. The resulting framework specifies five learning-ecosystem dimensions, seven function-based competency macro-domains, four testable hypotheses, and a four-stage validation protocol. Empirical validation is planned with at least 400 active MICE certification participants or graduates using content validation, psychometric assessment, PLS-SEM, and domain-score clustering. The framework contributes by distinguishing learning processes, competency attainment, employability, and clustering outputs, thereby providing a basis for testing, replication, and targeted learning pathways. No empirical effects are claimed before participant-level data are collected.
References
Badan Nasional Sertifikasi Profesi. (2026). MICE Pertemuan Perjalanan Insentif Konvensi dan Pameran: Data skema. Retrieved July 15, 2026, from https://bnsp.go.id/lsp/mice-pertemuan-perjalanan-insentif-konvensi-dan-pameran
Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49(4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of workplace learning, 13(5), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005548
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in public health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Brewer, L. (2013). Enhancing youth employability: What? Why? and How? Guide to core work skills (pp. 1-51). Geneva: ILO.
Clarke, M. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in higher education, 43(11), 1923-1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational behavior, 65(1), 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hecht, M., & Crowley, K. (2020). Unpacking the learning ecosystems framework: Lessons from the adaptive management of biological ecosystems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 264-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693381
Hennig, C. (2007). Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(1), 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.025
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304
Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842221
Jackson, D., & Dean, B. A. (2023). The contribution of different types of work-integrated learning to graduate employability. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2048638
Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Keputusan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 123 Tahun 2024 tentang penetapan Standar Kompetensi Kerja Nasional Indonesia bidang Meeting, Incentive, Convention and Exhibition (MICE). https://jdih.kemnaker.go.id/asset/data_puu/2024kmnaker123.pdf
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Musset, P. (2019). Improving work-based learning in schools. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 233. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/918caba5-en
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Pool, L. D., & Sewell, P. (2007). The key to employability: developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education + training, 49(4), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710754435
Rothwell, A., & Arnold, J. (2007). Self-perceived employability: Development and validation of a scale. Personnel Review, 36(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710716704
Rothwell, A., Herbert, I., & Rothwell, F. (2008). Self-perceived employability: Construction and initial validation of a scale for university students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.12.001
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001). Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00293
van der Heijde, C. M., & van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2006). A competence-based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20119
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
