Implementation of the online teacher competency improvement training program in the diklat.co semarang learning community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v12i32025p129Keywords:
Online Training, Teacher Competency, Training ProgramAbstract
This study aimed to describe the process and impact of online teacher competency improvement training through the Diklat.co platform in supporting the implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka (Freedom Curriculum). This research employed a qualitative approach with a case study method. The data were collected through observations, interviews, and documentation of the training implementation. The findings indicate that online-based training effectively enhances teachers’ pedagogical and professional competencies. This occurs through reflective discussions, sharing of best practices, and the use of technology in the learning process. The participants reported increased confidence in applying differentiated instruction and diagnostic assessments following the training. However, challenges remain, including limited infrastructure, varying levels of digital literacy, and scheduling constraints that overlap with teachers’ existing workloads. This study recommends the online-based training model as a flexible, collaborative, and relevant alternative to support teacher professionalism development in the digital era.
References
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311.
Deng, L., Wang, J., & Guo, X. (2022). Exploring teacher learning in online communities: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103726.
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers' professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515.
Haris, R., Mulyasa, E., & Suryana, A. (2020). Pengaruh pelatihan berbasis LMs terhadap peningkatan kompetensi guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 26(2), 120–131.
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303.
Kohnke, L., & Foung, D. (2023). Microlearning: A new normal for flexible teacher professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11964-6.
Kohnke, L., & Zou, D. (2021). Blended learning and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020.
Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627864.
Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008.
Lestari, N. D. (2023). Analisis efektivitas platform merdeka mengajar dalam pengembangan kompetensi guru. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 8(1), 45–58.
Louws, M. L., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & van Driel, J. H. (2017). Understanding teachers’ professional learning goals from their current professional concerns. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1383237.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609.
Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1145–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8.
Sari, P., & Wulandari, T. (2021). Pembelajaran berbasis komunitas dalam pelatihan guru: studi kasus pada komunitas guru inovatif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 11(3), 134–145.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
Susanto, A. (2022). Evaluasi pemanfaatan platform merdeka mengajar untuk pengembangan profesional guru. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(4), 200–210.
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007.
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? lessons learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/215995/.
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). A comprehensive framework for teachers’ integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 104, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.014.
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2014.42009.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Haris Pribadi, Deni Hardianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted articles in an open access repository.
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

This work (http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jinotep/index) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











