AR-CODE-AT for analytical thinking in elementary coding education: Design, expert validation, and user trial

Authors

  • Alfiah Fajriani Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
  • Hendra Nelva Saputra Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-6892
  • Priagung Zafitrah Pamungkas Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v13i32026p172%20

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Coding Education, Analytical Thinking, Computational Thinking, Elementary Education, Instructional Design

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) can make abstract programming logic more tangible, but its educational value depends on an instructional architecture that specifies how AR supports reasoning, coding, scaffolding, and assessment. This study developed, expert-validated, and empirically piloted AR-CODE-AT, a seven-stage AR-assisted coding strategy for upper-primary education. A four-phase formative design-and-validation model was used: needs analysis, design translation, expert validation and revision, and a limited user trial. Phase 1 analysed 16 valid needs responses and showed very high development support (M = 4.55/5, SD = 0.46). Phase 2 involved six experts evaluating 48 items across nine design domains; expert validation yielded M = 4.36, SD = 0.54, and mean Aiken’s V = .841 (item range = .750–.917), with 39/48 items (81.25%) reaching V ≥ .80. Phase 3 implemented the revised prototype with 15 Grade 5 students and one classroom teacher. Student practicality reached M = 3.39/4 (SD = 0.26; 84.7%), implementation fidelity was 5/7 stages (71.4%), and teacher practicality was M = 3.67/5 (73.3%). The analytical-thinking process rubric yielded M = 2.83/4 (SD = 0.54). Design-theoretically, the study specifies how AR functions, coding actions, scaffolding/fading, and process assessment are aligned across the seven stages; methodologically, it provides a traceable evidence chain from needs to expert judgment to user implementation. The pilot is descriptive and does not establish learning gains or comparative effectiveness.

References

Akbar, A., Herman, T., Suryadi, D., Mursalim, Alman, Putra, E. D., & Blegur, J. (2025). Integrating augmented reality in mathematics learning to improve critical thinking skills of elementary school students. Emerging Science Journal, 9(2), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-014

Bati, K. (2022). A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2059–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2

Claro, M., Castro-Grau, C., Ochoa, J. M., Hinostroza, J. E., & Cabello, P. (2024). Systematic review of quantitative research on digital competences of in-service school teachers. Computers & Education, 215, 105030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105030

Falloon, G. (2024). Advancing young students’ computational thinking: An investigation of structured curriculum in early years primary schooling. Computers & Education, 216, 105045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105045

Faria, A., & Miranda, G. L. (2024). Augmented reality in natural sciences and biology teaching: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Emerging Science Journal, 8(4), 1666–1685. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-04-025

Gao, X., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Toward a 5E-based flipped classroom model for teaching computational thinking in elementary school: Effects on student computational thinking and problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 512–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211037757

Gao, X., & Hew, K. F. (2023). A flipped systematic debugging approach to enhance elementary students’ program debugging performance and optimize cognitive load. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5), 1064–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221133560

Gao, X., Yang, Y., Du, Y., & Sun, D. (2025). Effect of mind mapping-based scaffolding on elementary students’ computational thinking in block-based programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(1), 236–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241303067

Izzati, A. A. T., Sa’dijah, C., Arifin, S., Dewi, R. S. I., & Ekawati, R. (2026). Integrating augmented reality in mathematics: A mixed-methods systematic review of spatial and geometric learning. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 13(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v13i2.85197

Jang, J., Jeon, J., & Jung, S. K. (2026a). Immersive Technologies (AR/VR) for Computer Science and Computational Thinking Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Trends and Gaps. IEEE Access, 14, 54414–54441. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3680395

Jegstad, K. M., Heggernes, S. L., Jøsok, E., Ryen, E., Svanes, I. K., & Tørnby, H. (2025). Approaches to critical thinking in primary education classrooms: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 48, 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100711

Kalemkuş, J., & Kalemkuş, F. (2023). Effect of the use of augmented reality applications on academic achievement of student in science education: Meta analysis review. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 6017–6034. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2027458

Kania, N., Kusumah, Y. S., Dahlan, J. A., Nurlaelah, E., Gürbüz, F., & Bonyah, E. (2024). Constructing and providing content validity evidence through the Aiken’s V index based on the experts’ judgments of the instrument to measure mathematical problem-solving skills. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i1.71032

Kao, G. Y.-M., & Ruan, C.-A. (2022). Designing and evaluating a high interactive augmented reality system for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107245

Latifah, A. Y. N., Wahyudin, D., & Mulyasari, E. (2026). Planetaria: Augmented reality-based learning media on solar system lessons for elementary school students. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 13(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v13i12026p024

Lee, S. J., Francom, G. M., & Nuatomue, J. (2022). Computer science education and K-12 students’ computational thinking: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102008

Leon Diaz, F. Y., Boude Figueredo, O. R., & Vargas Sanchez, A. D. (2026). Pedagogical mediation with ICT for the development of critical thinking in primary education: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 60, 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102085

Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis of the effects of augmented reality technologies in interactive learning environments (2012–2022). Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(4), 1111–1131. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22628

Mills, K. A., Cope, J., Scholes, L., & Rowe, L. (2025). Coding and computational thinking across the curriculum: A review of educational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 95(3), 581–618. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241241327

Mustika, D., Kustandi, D., Farida, I. A., & Ihsan, I. R. (2026). Experiential psychological mechanisms in immersive learning: Presence, embodiment, and engagement as mediator in learning outcomes. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 13(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v13i12026p048

Nordby, S. K., Bjerke, A. H., & Mifsud, L. (2022). Computational thinking in the primary mathematics classroom: A systematic review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5

Purwono, R., Nuswowati, M., Subali, B., & Ellianawati. (2026). Coding-based instruction for developing computational thinking in primary education: A systematic review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 13(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.13.1.66-84

Rusnilawati, Rizki, A. F., Rahman, F., Hazima, A. A., Utomo, A. C., & Sulaimon, J. T. (2026). Augmented inquiry: Developing AR-based media for spatial geometry in elementary schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 13(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.13.1.147-174

Sakr, A., & Abdullah, T. (2024). Virtual, augmented reality and learning analytics impact on learners, and educators: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19913–19962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12602-5

Santaengracia, J. J., Palop, B., & Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J. (2026). Computational thinking in K-6 education: A scoping review of instructional practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 13, 983–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00380-z

Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education. Computers & Education Open, 4, 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122

Tawfik, A. A., Payne, L., & Olney, A. M. (2024). Scaffolding computational thinking through block coding: A learner experience design study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09636-4

Usfinit, I. F., Kuswandi, D., & Soepriyanto, Y. (2025). Development of augmented reality feature modules on the introduction of historical monuments in Timor Leste. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 11(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v11i12024p011

Yang, T.-C., & Lin, Z.-S. (2024). Enhancing elementary school students’ computational thinking and programming learning with graphic organizers. Computers & Education, 209, 104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104962

Zhu, X., Peng, K., Yu, S., & Wang, G. (2026). Can augmented reality technology reduce learners’ cognitive load? A meta-analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 13, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00429-7

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Fajriani, A., Saputra, H. N., & Pamungkas, P. Z. (2026). AR-CODE-AT for analytical thinking in elementary coding education: Design, expert validation, and user trial. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 13(3), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v13i32026p172

Issue

Section

Articles